[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

















Tech Update 
Do you really need an app server?
By Tim Landgrave
TechRepublic
June 24, 2002


TalkBack! Add your opinion

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

In the 70s and early 80s, when mainframe databases ruled and the micro- and mini-computer revolutions were in their infancy, there were literally hundreds of companies competing to be the new database of choice.

It had become clear that as more companies began using smaller computers, they could neither afford the database technology available on the mainframe, nor the cost of custom coding flat or index file data-manipulation applicationsfor each new application that they developed.

The rise and adoption of the relational database became a key driver that allowed minicomputers and PC networks to replace mainframes as the primary business platform. Today, there are only three or four primary database vendors left standing (depending on how you count them): IBM (DB/2), Oracle, Microsoft (SQL Server), and Sybase.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

In the 70s and early 80s, when mainframe databases ruled and the micro- and mini-computer revolutions were in their infancy, there were literally hundreds of companies competing to be the new database of choice.

It had become clear that as more companies began using smaller computers, they could neither afford the database technology available on the mainframe, nor the cost of custom coding flat or index file data-manipulation applicationsfor each new application that they developed.

The rise and adoption of the relational database became a key driver that allowed minicomputers and PC networks to replace mainframes as the primary business platform. Today, there are only three or four primary database vendors left standing (depending on how you count them): IBM (DB/2), Oracle, Microsoft (SQL Server), and Sybase.

If you check out the relatively nascent market for application servers, you’ll see a similar pattern emerging. The first inclination is to begin considering technology investments before you’re left with applications that have to be rewritten or ported to a different platform, because your vendor no longer exists. But a bigger question looms: Do you really need an application server?
TechRepublic provides insight, advice, and technical information written by IT professionals for IT professionals.
Have the top IT experts by your side today--FREE!


1 2 3 4 
Next page 

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]




[an error occurred while processing this directive]
1. Do you really need an app server?
2. Problem lies in the definition
3. The future: Commoditization and specialization
4. Do you need one or not?


ARTICLES
Risk in app server decisions rising
J2EE or .Net? Making that vital development decision
Sun: We're a software giant, too
A safety net for high-flying J2EE applications
HP abandons e-business software
Reader feedback: Microsoft should acknowledge Oracle and DB2
IBM gives software the business
PRODUCTS
BEA WebLogic Enterprise 6.1
Lotus Domino Application Server R5
Silverstream Application Server 3.5
Sun ONE Application Server, Enterprise Edition
Sybase Enterprise Application Server 4.0





TECH UPDATE TODAY DAILY:
Dan Farber and David Berlind deliver daily insights on the business and technology news that matters to enterprise IT.


Enterprise Alerts
IT Management
IT Professionals
Online Shopping
System Administration
Linux

Manage My Newsletters





[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]