[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

















Tech Update 
REALITY CHECK

When will IBM buy Sun?
Migrating Microsoft customers
back to intro
By David Berlind
April 8, 2002

TalkBack! Add your opinion

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Taking control of Java isn't the only thing IBM must do to marginalize Microsoft. IBM must make it easier for Microsoft's customers to migrate from Windows to Java. If Eclipse opens that door, then IBM's collaboration with Microsoft to form the Web Services Interoperability Organization (WS-I) and the interoperability standards it supports knocks that door down. As I point out in my investigative analysis, the circumstances under which Sun was issued a last-minute invitation to join the WS-I as a contributor (as opposed to board member) reek of hardball politics. Should Sun join without a board seat, the company's plans for Java could be dictated in part by the companies that license it: IBM, BEA, and Oracle. All are WS-I board members. Advantage: IBM.

Microsoft is probably happy to participate in anything that sticks it to Sun the way the WS-I could. But I wonder if Redmond sees IBM's interest in the WS-I the way I see it--as an interoperability standard that will allow IBM to marginalize Microsoft by easily migrating Microsoft's customers to IBM's Java-based solutions. Should control of Java, through purchase or donation to the open-source community, ever be wrested from Sun, IBM would surely be in the catbird seat. Talk about a deal with the devil.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
While IBM does what it can to keep Java's star shining brightly on its own terms, the company is also doing everything it can to dismantle the rest of Sun. The two companies are engaged in a bloodbath on the hardware front that has resulted in an increased share of the server market for IBM, at the expense of Sun, HP, and Compaq.



(Sun vociferously debates the accuracy of IDC's figures.) The now merging HP and Compaq have each announced plans to discontinue their RISC technologies (PA-RISC and Alpha, respectively). IBM, however, is going full steam ahead with the PowerPC microprocessors that power the newest AIX-based enemy to Sun's Solaris and SPARC processors: Regatta.

Overall, the results for Sun, which is also embattled by Compaq, HP, and now Dell, are reflected in its stock price. As of this writing, Sun, which once traded in the 60s, was dangerously close to a three-year low.

Should Sun's $28 billion market capitalization decline any further, there's only one company that could absorb Sun with pocket change: IBM. In addition to putting IBM in control of its own destiny and giving it the IP and market presence needed to combat Microsoft, an IBM takeover of Sun would also turn the microprocessor battle against Intel into a two-horse race. If IBM makes its move, when will that be?

Should IBM buy Sun? Can IBM pull this off? Write to me at david.berlind@cnet.com, or share your thoughts in TalkBack.

 Previous page |   1 2 3 

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]




[an error occurred while processing this directive]
1. When will IBM buy Sun?
2. Eclipse of the Sun
3. Migrating Microsoft customers


ARTICLES
Was Sun nudged to Web services sidelines?
WS-I must add Sun to board now
Special report: IBM: The big picture is the bottom line
The Liberty Alliance--national ID connection
Web Services Update
PRODUCTS
IBM WebSphere

[an error occurred while processing this directive]




TECH UPDATE TODAY DAILY:
Dan Farber and David Berlind deliver daily insights on the business and technology news that matters to enterprise IT.


Enterprise Alerts
IT Management
IT Professionals
Online Shopping
System Administration
Linux

Manage My Newsletters





[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]